top of page
Image by Suzanne D. Williams

EVOLUTION CARTOON

EVOLUTION CARTOON

Canis lepophagus (hare-eating dog).png

Evolution Cartoon: Dog

Coyotes and wolves are thought to have descended from Canis lepophagus. It should be mentioned that Canis familiaris descended from gray wolves, Canis lupus. C. lepophagus as having a skeleton and skull that are more thin than those of a modern coyote. While domestic dogs tend to be wider and stockier, wolves are built to run with narrow chests and long legs. Dogs typically have less mental development than a wolf of a comparable age (Johnston, 1938; Schertz Animal Hospital, 2017; Prassack & Walkup, 2022).

dog

REFERENCES

[1] Johnston, C. S. (1938). Preliminary report on the vertebrate type locality of Cita Canyon, and the description of an ancestral coyote. American Journal of Science, 5(209), 383-390.

[2]  Prassack, K. A., & Walkup, L. C. (2022). Maybe So, Maybe Not: Canis lepophagus at Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument, Idaho, USA. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 29(2),
313-333.

[3] Schertz Animal Hospital. (2017). Dogs and wolves: more different than they are alike? Retrieved May 4, 2023, from https://schertzanimalhospital.com/blog/dogs-and-wolves/

evol meme.png

Evolution Cartoon: Seahorse

Seahorses and their close relatives, including the seadragons and pipefishes, are iconic marine teleost species, belonging to the family Syngnathidae that exhibit sex-role reversal in childbirth and parental care. This unique reproductive strategy became a valuable comparative model for the study of biology and the interpretation of evolutionary patterns in reproductive complexity. Sometime around 48 million years ago, during the Late Eocene or Early Oligocene epochs, the family Syngnathidae diverged from other teleosts, a time which is believed by scientists to be when syngnathid fishes began evolving specialized reproductive structures that led to the emergence of “male pregnancy”. Specialized reproductive adaptations, such as brood pouches for internal gestation or the external attachment of the eggs to the belly, were observed in the male syngnathid fishes, which allow them to carry the fertilized eggs, provide nutrients and oxygen to their babies during pregnancy, and give birth to live young. Scientists believed that Syngnathidae males evolved to carry the babies in order to achieve a higher productivity rate in terms of offspring production. This conventional mode of reproductive biology allows the female to allocate more of her energy and nutrient to producing eggs while the male carries the burden of pregnancy.

seahorse

REFERENCES

[1] Albritton, A. (2023). The Only Male Animals in the World That Get Pregnant and Give Birth. PADI Blog – Latest Scuba Diving News, Events, Blogs, Articles & More. https://blog.padi.com/the-only-male-animals-in-the-world-that-get-pregnant-and-give-birth/

[2] Lin, Q. (2021). Evolutionary History of Syngnathid Fishes.Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, 879–886. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0029117

[3] Roth, O., Solbakken, M. H., Tørresen, O. K., Bayer, T., Matschiner, M., Baalsrud, H. T., Hoff, S. N. K., Brieuc, M. S. O., Haase, D. G., Hanel, R., Reusch, T. B. H., & Jentoft, S. (2020). Evolution of male pregnancy associated with remodeling of canonical vertebrate immunity in seahorses and pipefishes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(17), 9431–9439. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916251117

[4] Whittington, C. M., & Friesen, C. R. (2020). The evolution and physiology of male pregnancy in syngnathid fishes. Biological Reviews, 95(5), 1252–1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12607

Coelacanth.png

Evolution Cartoon: Coelacanth

Perhaps one interesting organism that has had a bizarre evolution is the coelacanth. Literally, it looks almost the same even after 360 million years! With that long time in existence and so little observable morphological change, the platypus seems to be eating the coelacanth’s dust when it comes to being which looks more like a living fossil. According to McGrouther (2021), with a peak in abundance around 240 million years ago, coelacanths were known to have become extinct 80 million years ago. But, alas! They were rediscovered in 1938 when one specimen was caught at the mouth of the Chalumna River on the east coast of South Africa. As explained by Nelson et al. (2016), Coelacanths are an ancient group of lobe-finned fish in the class Actinistia. As sarcopterygians, they are more closely related to lungfish and tetrapods—a group that includes mammals, birds, amphibians, and reptiles—than they are to ray-finned fish. There are currently only two known marine extant species of coelacanths: the West Indian Ocean coelacanth (Latimeria chalumnae), which is mainly found near the Comoro Islands off the east coast of Africa, and the Indonesian coelacanth (Latimeria menadoensis) in the waters of North Sulawesi as well as Papua and West Papua. Although the species look very similar, they have differences in size and the number of fins. Roberts et al. (2018) & Amemiya et al. (2013) state that the adult Indonesian coelacanth typically measures around 1.5 meters (5 feet) in length, although West Indian Ocean coelacanths can grow as long as 2 meters (6.5 feet). As a result, the Indonesian coelacanth is typically smaller than the West Indian Ocean coelacanth. The West Indian Ocean coelacanth has seven or eight fins, whereas the Indonesian coelacanth typically has six. In a comparison between populations of coelacanths in Tanzania and Comoro, researchers have found that the differences between groups of coelacanths extend beyond the physical. Nikaido et al. (2011) discovered that some fish from Tanzania have distinctive genetic variations and no fish from Comora or anywhere else had these varieties. This has led them to believe that coelacanths from northern Tanzania constitute a distinct breeding population from those from the southern and Comoros regions and that the two populations may eventually evolve into distinct species in the future. However, it is still quite fascinating how the coelacanths of today look really similar to what they looked like 360 million years ago. Is it not crazy? According to Stromberg (2013), some scientists believe that coelacanths’ slow evolutionary transformation is caused by their extremely stable deep Indian and Indonesian Ocean environments and relative lack of predators.

coelacanth

Evolution Cartoon: Pig

Pig.png

 Ever wondered what the internet-famous mini pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) looked like in the past? It might come as a shock that their ancestor from almost three million years ago, the Eurasian wild boar, looked quite the opposite of cute, tiny, and whatever adjective mini pigs are famous for today.  The Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa), also known as the common wild pig, wild swine, or simply wild pig, is a suid native to much of North Africa and Eurasia (Chen et al., 2007). The same source reveals that, through mtDNA research, it is perceived that the wild boar first appeared during the Early Pleistocene on Southeast Asian islands like Indonesia and the Philippines before spreading to Eurasia's mainland and North Africa. Eventually, humans started domesticating them and, subsequently, selective breeding between wild boars and domestic pigs has resulted in the development of modern miniature pigs. The domestication of wild boars—which were carefully selected for their meat and fat content—started the process of selective breeding toward smaller sizes thousands of years ago (Frantz et al., 2019). Smaller pig breeds were created in the 20th century as a result of researchers starting to selectively breed pigs for biomedical research (Brambell, 1972). Apart from that, a number of miniature pig breeds were created as a result of the popularity of these smaller, selectively bred pigs as pets and companion animals over time (Swindle et al., 2012). In other words, breeders have created a wide variety of miniature pig breeds that are suitable for a number of uses, from biomedical research to pets and companionship, by carefully breeding for smaller sizes and other desired features.

pig

REFERENCES

[1] Amemiya, C. T., Alföldi, J., Lee, A. P., Fan, S., Philippe, H., Maccallum, I., … Lindblad-Toh, K. (2013). The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature, 496(7445), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12027

[2] Brambell, F. W. (1972). The evolution of the pig. In The domestic pig: The biology of suiformes (pp. 1-32). Cornell University Press.

[3] Frantz, L. A. F., Schraiber, J. G., Madsen, O., Megens, H. J., Cagan, A., Bosse, M., ... & Alexander, M. (2019). Genetic adaptation of the Hungarian Mangalica pig to cold winters. Genome Biology, 20(1), 57.

[4] McGrouther, M. (2021). Coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae Smith, 1939. Retrieved May 2, 2023, from https://australian.museum/learn/animals/fishes/coelacanth-latimeria-chalumnae-smith-1939/#:~:text=Coelacanths%20are%20known%20from%20the,disappeared%20from%20the%20fossil%20record.

[5] Nelson, J., Grande, T., & Wilson, M. (2016). Fishes of the World. Retrieved May 2, 2023, from https://www.worldcat.org/title/951128215

[6] Nikaido, M., Sasaki, T., Emerson, J. J., Aibara, M., Mzighani, S. I., Budeba, Y. L., ... & Okada, N. (2011). Genetically distinct coelacanth population off the northern Tanzanian coast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(44), 18009-18013.

[7] Roberts, D. G., Stewart, B. A., & Struthers, C. D. (2018). Morphometric and meristic variation in Latimeria chalumnae and L. menadoensis (Actinistia: Coelacanthidae) from South Africa, Tanzania and Indonesia. African Journal of Marine Science, 40(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232x.2017.1375583

[8] Stromberg, J. (2013). DNA Sequencing Reveals that Coelacanths Weren’t the Missing Link Between Sea and Land. Retrieved May 2, 2023, from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dna-sequencing-reveals-that-coelacanths-werent-the-missing-link-between-sea-and-land-25025860/#:~:text=The%20research%20team%20speculates%20that,undergone%20such%20slow%20evolutionary%20changes.

[9] Swindle, M. M., Smith, A. C., & Fish, R. E. (2012). Miniature pigs as preclinical models. In Swine in biomedical research (pp. 255-267). CRC Press.

Evolution Cartoon: Cavefish

cavefish.png

"Where'd the eyes go in the fish?" you may ask. Many organisms have experienced the loss or reduction of traits throughout their evolutionary histories. As with our primate ancestors, we, humans, also lost our tails (thank goodness, can you imagine if we still had them?). The primary driver for active selection in terms of ocular regression is energy conservation. The nervous system must balance demands such as conserving energy, especially since neural tissues are one of the most energy-intensive tissues to create and maintain. This is especially important in low-energy conditions like caves where the sun never rises and finding food is difficult. Because cavefishes are always in the dark, they must rely on other senses other than sight for reproduction and hunting. Because of this, these fish have developed over many generations to be able to survive in the dark. However, they all descended from fish that have eyes. Nevertheless, over millions of years, these fish have both lost the ability to see and acquired the capacity to function without it (American Museum of Natural History, 2014; Krishnan & Rohner, 2017).

cavefish

REFERENCES

[1] American Museum of Natural History. (2012). Why Do Cave Fish Lose Their Eyes? Readworks. https://www.amnh.org/content/download/109169/1987450/file/StepReads%20for%20Grades%206-8.pdf

[2] Krishnan, J., & Rohner, N. (2017). Cavefish and the basis for eye loss. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 372(1713), 20150487. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0487

Evolution Cartoon: Penguuin

penguin.png

Penguins are birds, but why can't they fly? Well, penguins have long since lost their ability to fly. According to biomechanics, the birds' wings for flight simply got more and more effective at swimming and finally lost their capacity to lift penguins off the ground (Handwerk, 2021). Due to their constant proximity to water, penguins had to rely on the ocean as their primary food source. They didn't require flight when they first evolved from flying birds. As hollow bones are common in flying birds as they reduce the weight of the animal, the penguin's wings are heavier and can move across the water more quickly as a result. They developed "flippers" in place of genuine wings throughout time, becoming more and more of an aquatic bird. Other researchers also state that for a bird that spent so much time in the water, getting off the ground required too much energy. Therefore, they have chosen to become skilled swimmers rather than flyers as they have evolved to fit their environment (Fox, 2021; Haskins, 2010).

penguin

REFERENCES

[1] Fox, B. (2021, November 19). If Penguins have wings, why can’t they fly? Catalina Island Marine Institute. https://cimi.org/blog/if-penguins-have-wings-why-cant-they-fly/

[2] Handwerk, B. (2013, May 21). Why Did Penguins Stop Flying? The Answer Is Evolutionary. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/131320-penguin-evolution-science-flight-diving-swimming-wings

[3] Haskins, N. (2010, November 11). The Evolution of a Penguin. Science Leadership Academy @ Center City. https://scienceleadership.org/blog/the_evolution_of_a_penguin

bottom of page